Update: Feb. 18, 2022: At DOL's request, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the challenges to the ETS as moot. "Because the ETS’s requirements are no longer in effect as a result of OSHA’s withdrawal, the challenged requirements from which Petitioners seek relief are no longer in effect," it said. "Accordingly, we GRANT the Government’s motion and DISMISS the case as moot."
- The U.S. Department of Labor will withdraw its emergency temporary standard requiring COVID-19 vaccination or testing for workers at large employers but continue to pursue a permanent standard to that effect, according to a Federal Register notice scheduled to publish Wednesday.
- The agency also on Tuesday asked the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss judicial challenges to the emergency standard as moot. As of tomorrow, the ETS will no longer be in effect, it said, "and petitioners will no longer be subject — or face any risk of being subject — to the challenged requirements from which they sought relief."
- The agency was careful to note, however, that its withdrawal does not affect OSHA's plan to make such a requirement permanent.
The withdrawal follows a Jan. 13 stay from the U.S. Supreme Court. Lawsuits questioned whether federal workplace safety law gives OSHA the power to enact such an emergency standard; finding that the challenges were likely to succeed on their merits, the court temporarily blocked the ETS just as it was taking effect.
Immediately following the high court's opinion, Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh said in a tweet that OSHA "stands by the Vaccination and Testing ETS as the best way to protect the nation's workforce from this deadly virus: COVID-19."
Today's SCOTUS decision is a major setback to the health and safety of workers across the country.@OSHA_DOL stands by the Vaccination and Testing ETS as the best way to protect the nation's workforce from this deadly virus: COVID-19.— Secretary Marty Walsh (@SecMartyWalsh) January 13, 2022
While the agency is now stepping back from its ETS — indicated by both the withdrawal and its court filings — OSHA was clear that its moves should not affect the non-emergency version of the mandate: "Although OSHA is withdrawing the Vaccination and Testing ETS as an enforceable emergency temporary standard, OSHA is not withdrawing the ETS to the extent that it serves as a proposed rule [...] or otherwise affect the status of the notice-and-comment rulemaking commenced by the Vaccination and Testing ETS," it said.
According to a description of OSHA standards on the agency's website, emergency temporary standards are in effect until superseded by a permanent standard. They serve as a proposed rule, which "is then subject to the usual procedure for adopting a permanent standard except that a final ruling should be made within six months." Such a timeline could make a final rule due around May.